On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 16:04, Jack Howarth <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 04:00:31PM -0700, Toby Peterson wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 15:53, Jack Howarth <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 05:44:59PM -0500, Brian Barnes wrote: >> >> >> >> Or, perhaps let's hope that people exist with motive, means and >> >> opportunity to contribute to gcc and keep it working on OS X, and are >> >> able to do so. I would rather not lose future updates to the only fast, >> >> free Fortran compiler on OS X. I cannot comprehend why you wish for some >> >> of us to lose our tools with no fast, free replacement even vaguely in >> >> sight. >> >> >> >> Brian >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> macports-dev mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev >> > >> > That answer is easy. Toby doesn't need them. >> >> While that is true, the main thing is that this discussion belongs elsewhere. >> >> This is macports-dev >> >> - Toby > > Well it directly impacts one of your ports (regardless of how much you > detest that particular package) and all other ports like octave that depend > on it.
To which port are you referring? - Toby _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
