On 2011-07-24 22:28 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: > Correction: it appears using four kinds of checksums for a distfile > (md5, sha1, rmd160, and sha256) causes this error. I have now > corrected this problem in all ports found doing this. Using sha256 in > combination with only one or two other kinds of checksums seems to be > fine (except that of course MacPorts 1.9.2 cannot verify sha256 > checksums). There is no reason to list more than two kinds of > checksums for a distfile anyway, so this should not be a difficult > problem for port authors to deal with: simply only list sha1 and > rmd160 checksums for each distfile, as we've been recommending for > awhile now.
I don't quite get it. Do I understand correctly that using four checksum types results in an error even on 2.0.0? Can you give a working and broken example including sha256? Rainer _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
