On Jul 25, 2011, at 04:06, Rainer Müller wrote: > On 2011-07-24 22:28 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> Correction: it appears using four kinds of checksums for a distfile >> (md5, sha1, rmd160, and sha256) causes this error. I have now >> corrected this problem in all ports found doing this. Using sha256 in >> combination with only one or two other kinds of checksums seems to be >> fine (except that of course MacPorts 1.9.2 cannot verify sha256 >> checksums). There is no reason to list more than two kinds of >> checksums for a distfile anyway, so this should not be a difficult >> problem for port authors to deal with: simply only list sha1 and >> rmd160 checksums for each distfile, as we've been recommending for >> awhile now. > > I don't quite get it. Do I understand correctly that using four checksum > types results in an error even on 2.0.0?
I'm sure it works fine on 2.0.0. I haven't upgraded yet. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
