On 2012-2-17 16:13 , Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: > Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >> On Feb 16, 2012, at 23:03, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: >> >>>> And now we really really need binary packages to include what version of >>>> Xcode they were built on, not just what version of OS X they were built >>>> on. :( And we should be keeping that information in the registry as well. >>> >>> Never thought I'd say it: conveniently we don't have a Lion buildbot. >> >> Yes, but it's any port the user installed, whether from the buildbot or >> built locally. Just as we already consider a port outdated if it was built >> with an older version of OS X, we should be considering it outdated if it >> was built with an older version of Xcode. > > So - this upgrade of XCode to 4.3 necessiates a complete rebuild of all > installed packages due to the changes in where XCode stores binaries and > SDKs ???
No. This is exactly as big a change as Xcode 4.1 -> 4.2, which also changed the default compiler path. - Josh _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev