On Feb 15, 2013, at 12:18 PM, Sean Farley <s...@macports.org> wrote:
> > Rainer Müller writes: > >> On 2013-02-15 09:10, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: >>> I'd like to update base trunk such that future versions of clang, >>> dragonegg, and gcc "just work", so we don't need to wait for newer versions >>> of base to depend on newer compilers. >>> >>> I've taken a first pass at portconfigure.tcl and here is a patch. >>> Comments? Concerns? >> >> Fine with me. >> >> This change makes sense as the features supported by the gcc and clang >> compilers shipped in ports are almost homogenous at the moment; in the >> past there were differences as not all gcc4* shipped gfortran or gcj. >> However, I don't expect the situation to change in the near future. > > Clang doesn't provide fortran but all gcc ports do. How is that almost > homogenous? Did you actually look at the patch? It doesn't treat clang the same as it does gcc. It treats all gcc versions the same as all other gcc versions; it treats all clang versions the same as all other clang versions; and it treats all dragonegg versions the same as it treats all other dragonegg versions... > That's a huge difference when building mpi-dependent ports. Which is not really affected by this…
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
