On Aug 24, 2013, at 19:35, Sean Farley <s...@macports.org> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia > <jerem...@macports.org> wrote: >> ping. Can I please get some feedback on this? Can some maintainers of >> fortran ports in math/science categories give this a try? We really need to >> get ports weened off of g++-mp-4.X … > > Well, I kind of gave some feedback here: > > https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/2013-August/023924.html
Thanks. I didn't notice it in the other thread =)
> "As a bonus, I believe fortran recipes like the one Jeremy sent
> earlier today (what a coincidence) could all be unified as such:
>
> {{{
> PortGroup compilers 1.0
>
> compilers.setup -clang require_fortran
> }}}
> "
>
> I could even add another option called 'only_fortran' that would only
> set the f77, f90, and fc variables, if need be.
Or more abstractly, take a list of variables to set:
compilers.choose f77 f90 fc
compilers.setup require_fortran
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
