Well I can live with the workaround, it is not even to cumbersome. However, I intuitively assumed it would be available, tried it and it was not. Anyway, I think it is consistent with the logic of the system, so it would not hurt.
+1 On Oct 3, 2013, at 2:56 , Eric Gallager <eg...@gwmail.gwu.edu> wrote: > I have actually wanted something like this in base for a while now, and just > forgot to open a ticket about it... > > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Ryan Schmidt <ryandes...@macports.org> wrote: > On Oct 2, 2013, at 16:49, Eric Gallager wrote: > > > If it's so easy to work around it, then that means it should be pretty easy > > to add an alias or something that does the same thing as the workaround in > > base, right? > > It would be implemented differently in base -- copy the -append > implementation and change it slightly -- but yes it would be easy to do. Here > it is: > > https://trac.macports.org/ticket/40655 > > Do we want this in base? There are probably other situations where it's > useful too. > > > > _______________________________________________ > macports-dev mailing list > macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org > https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
