What about using the libcxx and libcxxabi ports for libc++? Is there any way to make that work?
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Clemens Lang <c...@macports.org> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 05:00:25PM +0000, Christopher Jones wrote: > > Is this really a good idea though. My recollection is, whilst not as > > bad as mixing libc++ and libstdc++ runtimes, mixing the two different > > libstd++ runtimes can still lead to problems…. ? > > Under the constraints we have I think its the best solution possible. > Alternatives would be > > - Mark the port as broken on systems < darwin13 :( > - Build a private copy of all dependencies of rethinkdb against > macports libstdc++. Since that includes boost and a couple of other > rather large ports, I don't think this is a feasible solution either. > - Get Apple to ship a version of libstdc++ that supports C++11 on > outdated OS releases > - Get Apple to make libc++ the default stdlib on all releases that have > libc++ > > None of those sound very appealing to me. > > -- > Clemens Lang > > _______________________________________________ > macports-dev mailing list > macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org > https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev >
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
