On Dec 14, 2014, at 8:58 PM, Ryan Schmidt <ryandes...@macports.org> wrote:
> >> On Dec 14, 2014, at 11:59 AM, khindenb...@macports.org wrote: > > This doesn't look sufficient. If pinentry support is automatically included > simply because pinentry is installed, then the main (non-pinentry) port needs > to be fixed not to use pinentry even if it is already installed. > > Moreover, it seems strange to implement this as a subport instead of a > variant. Unless a subport is a -devel subport, it's not supposed to conflict > with the main port. Variants are typically used to enable optional features; > pinentry support thus seems like a natural fit for a variant. What is the > implication of having lastpass-cli built with pinentry support? I'm not > really clear on what pinentry is. My fault - I was under the impression we didn’t want to use variants anymore. I’ll correct shortly. pinentry is gnupg’s way to enter pin/password via dialogs. Kurt _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
