Hi Lawrence, On 15 Dec 2014, at 21:50 , Lawrence Velázquez <[email protected]> wrote: > Why are you only increasing the revision when you've actually completely > changed the upstream software the port is retrieving? Using revision as a > proxy for version (along with a made-up and meaningless version) is an abuse > of our versioning system.
I simply was unsure how to handle the case of a non-existent version number for this project when I created it back then. Now I see that I have done something really wrong here… :-( I didn’t mean to _abuse_ anything and I am sorry for the confusion caused with all this. If you think it is really _necessary_ to go for epoch now, let me know. All I can hope for is, that there will be a release with a true version number one day! Regards, Marko _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
