On Dec 15, 2014, at 5:09 PM, Marko Käning <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 15 Dec 2014, at 22:49 , Lawrence Velázquez <[email protected]> wrote: >> The best way to handle this situation is to set `version` to a revision >> number (only if upstream uses a version control system that has strictly >> increasing identifiers) or a date. > > it doesn’t, as it is github. So a date would be best, then. >> I don't think switching from "0.0.2" to "2014-12-15" (or whatever the >> appropriate date is) would require increasing `epoch`, but I'm not sure. > > Neither am I, which is why I don’t touch this now and wait for a real > versioning to come. :) Will that ever happen? Is upstream planning on cutting real releases? vq _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
