On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 2:18 AM, Mihai Moldovan <[email protected]> wrote:
> This by itself is not pulling in anything yet. What I wanted to express > is that I assume using libstdc++ on >= 10.9 an error and using libc++ on > <= 10.8 an error. > 10.7 supports libc++. Why > would you not use libstdc++, if it works *and* can be used -- together > with GCC -- to compile C++11 code? Last I checked, it doesn't work; Apple does not and will not ship a libstdc++ that is C++11-compatible, because all such are GPL3. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates [email protected] [email protected] unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
