On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 9:54 AM, René J.V. <rjvber...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's a pity they don't even provide the source code for such a libstdc++ > version Why would they? They don't use it and you can get it from the gcc project easily enough. The main problem is that Apple's own C++ stuff is based on either a pre-C++11 libstdc++ or a C++11 libc++. You could probably build an official GPL3-d libstdc++ with C++11 support and it would probably even work (that being one of the points of C++11) but might not be able to distribute the resulting objects/binaries because of conflicts between GPL and Apple's licenses. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
