On 30.04.2015 03:56 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Apr 29, 2015, at 1:37 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> That was going to be my suggestion, to avoid a proliferation of portgroups 
>> that all do something similar.
> 
> For example, right now I'm dealing with the fact that gpsd 3.14 requires C11 
> (not C++11), and would like to be able to indicate that so that pre-C11 
> compilers get blacklisted.

Hmm, a valid request. But what is an appropriate name for such a PortGroup?
"standards"?

And what should the default value be? C++11? C11?



Mihai

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Reply via email to