On Saturday May 23 2015 16:21:27 Rainer Müller wrote: > 'port lint' already reports such a variant. However, it seems reasonable > to reject such a name completely.
Exactly my point (I'd have resorted to port lint if I hadn't caught the error in my eyelashes before, it always takes me a while to realise I might want to use such tools. I'm not old enough to have caught the "lint reflex" :) ) > > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/136619 Thanks, works as expected. R. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
