On 2015-5-24 00:21 , Rainer Müller wrote: > On 2015-05-22 13:31, René J.V. Bertin wrote: >> Is there a reason why the parser doesn't bark when one declares a >> variant with a name that starts with a +? It took me a while to find >> that as the reason for a variant that seemingly didn't want to get >> set while `port info` showed it as a default variant ... > > 'port lint' already reports such a variant. However, it seems reasonable > to reject such a name completely. > > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/136619
Note that this is technically a compatibility break. Using + or - in variant names was always right out of course, but lots of other "funny" characters would have worked fine. - Josh _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
