Hi,

----- On 24 Nov, 2015, at 10:45, René J.V. Bertin rjvber...@gmail.com wrote:

> Turns out it links to libboost_program_options, but rev-upgrade didn't catch 
> any
> issues.
> 
> Should it have had?

Depends. Did the compatibility version of libboost_program_options increase to
indicate that the library is no longer compatible to its previous version?

Also, how did it print a backtrace? If the library could not be loaded you 
should
see an error message printed by the loader on starting the binary, not a 
backtrace
later on. A backtrace suggests akonadi either tried to load the library using
dlopen(3) at runtime, or the two boost versions are ABI-compatible, but
implementation changed to cause new exceptions.

A third possibility would be that boost was built against a different C++ 
runtime
library than akonadi.

The backtrace would tell us more.

-- 
Clemens Lang
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Reply via email to