On Nov 24, 2015, at 1:27 PM, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > On Tuesday November 24 2015 20:00:27 Clemens Lang wrote: > >> On 24 Nov, 2015, at 10:45, René J.V. Bertin wrote: >> >>> Turns out it links to libboost_program_options, but rev-upgrade didn't >>> catch any >>> issues. >>> >>> Should it have had? >> >> Depends. Did the compatibility version of libboost_program_options increase >> to >> indicate that the library is no longer compatible to its previous version? > > Ah, no, both identify as > /opt/local/lib/libboost_program_options-mt.dylib (compatibility version > 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0)
Correct. It appears the developers of boost do not believe in advertising any compatibility version or current versions, to the detriment of any project unfortunate enough to use boost. Sounds like akonadi's revision should be increased to rebuild with this apparently incompatible new version of boost. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
