> On Jan 26, 2016, at 2:26 AM, René J.V. Bertin <rjvber...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Given the disk savings it can give I really don't understand why the patch > that adds HFS compression to port activation was never accepted.
For reference, that was this ticket: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/36560 There were performance concerns earlier in the discussion but I'm not sure if the latest version of the patch attached there resolves them. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
