> On Oct 7, 2016, at 3:24 PM, Ken Cunningham <ken.cunningham.web...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On 2016-10-07, at 10:05 AM, Rainer Müller wrote: >> >> I am not sure how we could change these to make triaging trickets >> easier. > > I can't easily just look at the list and see what are new requests for > ports to be included in macports. It all mixed in with other things.
You can use a Trac query for this: https://trac.macports.org/query?status=!closed&type=request&component=ports The Tickets page [1] on Trac has links for several such queries, there is a list of various Trac reports [2], and you can construct a custom query if you need to [3]. It might be useful to add more query links to the Tickets page. [1]: https://trac.macports.org/wiki/Tickets [2]: https://trac.macports.org/report [3]: https://trac.macports.org/query > Like Ryan said, I'd have separate queues for each major > category.. That's not really what Ryan said. He was just pointing out that our current selection of ticket types is inconsistent, not that we should add a bunch more. > let's see -- > > new incoming port requests that anyone could claim - port that > don't exist in macports at present https://trac.macports.org/query?status=!closed&type=request&component=ports&owner=macports-tickets%40lists.macosforge.org > new portfiles that have been finished and are awaiting committer > review https://trac.macports.org/query?status=!closed&type=submission&component=ports > requests for updates to existing ports by people who have > noticed something out on the web of significance. https://trac.macports.org/query?status=!closed&type=update&component=ports&keywords=!~haspatch > port updates with patches (approved by maintainer if there is > one) waiting for committer review https://trac.macports.org/query?status=!closed&type=update&component=ports&keywords=~haspatch >> Requests for new ports could still be valid after years. This list >> could be helpful for newcomers that want to create new ports. > > Totally agree - but I'd close everything over six months old or > something like that for optics. People can still search to "closed" > tickets if they want. I think we have a collective hoading instinct w.r.t. tickets. (Don't close that ticket! I might work on it one day. Really.) Perhaps we could be more bold about closing tickets with Rainer's "lack-of-interest" keyword, while making it easy to find all such tickets. https://trac.macports.org/query?status=closed&keywords=~lack-of-interest vq _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev