On Jan 25, 2021, at 11:37, Clemens Lang wrote: > I personally wouldn't have a problem with optional CI steps running on > other people's machines, as long as that's for pull requests and we > don't use the results anyhere but to post status information to GitHub. There would be an advantage to having the CI system on the same local network as the private packages server: not needing to upload private packages through my relatively slow upstream internet connection. Anyway, where we host it is a moot point until there is something to host.
- Can we enable CI for legacy systems? Ruben Di Battista
- Re: Can we enable CI for legacy systems? Ryan Schmidt
- Re: Can we enable CI for legacy systems? Ruben Di Battista
- Re: Can we enable CI for legacy systems... Ryan Schmidt
- Re: Can we enable CI for legacy sys... Ruben Di Battista
- Re: Can we enable CI for legac... Clemens Lang
- Re: Can we enable CI for l... Ryan Schmidt
- Re: Can we enable CI for legacy systems... Mojca Miklavec
- Re: Can we enable CI for legacy sys... Ryan Schmidt
- Re: Can we enable CI for legac... Ruben Di Battista
- Re: Can we enable CI for legacy systems? Ken Cunningham
- Re: Can we enable CI for legacy systems? Andrew Janke
- Re: Can we enable CI for legacy systems... Joshua Root
- Re: Can we enable CI for legacy sys... Ryan Schmidt
- Re: Can we enable CI for legac... Andrew Janke
- Re: Can we enable CI for l... Ryan Schmidt
- Re: Can we enable CI for legacy systems? wowfunha...@gmail.com