At 12:13 PM -0800 3/1/14, David Evans wrote:
On 3/1/14 6:48 AM, "René J.V. Bertin" wrote:
I'm getting a build error installing the +asm+universal x264 variant (x264@20130823+asm+universal) on OS X 10.9.1:

:info:build /usr/bin/clang -Wshadow -O3 -ffast-math -m32 -I. -fno-common -read_only_relocs suppress -arch i386 -Wall -I. -I. -falign-loops=16 -march=i686 -mfpmath=sse -msse -std=gnu99 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=5 -fPIC -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-tree-vectorize -c -o encoder/me.o encoder/me.c :info:build clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-read_only_relocs suppress' :info:build clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-falign-loops=16' :info:build clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-mfpmath=sse' :info:build clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-mpreferred-stack-boundary=5'
 :info:build In file included from encoder/me.c:28:
 :info:build In file included from ./common/common.h:987:
:info:build ./common/x86/util.h:131:9: error: ran out of registers during register allocation
 :info:build         "movq       (%2), %%mm5 \n"
 :info:build         ^
:info:build ./common/x86/util.h:194:9: error: ran out of registers during register allocation
 :info:build         "movq       (%2), %%mm5 \n"
 :info:build         ^
 :info:build 2 errors generated.


 with /usr/bin/clang being
 Apple LLVM version 5.0 (clang-500.2.79) (based on LLVM 3.3svn)
 Target: x86_64-apple-darwin13.0.0
 Thread model: posix

 Building with configure.compiler=macports-gcc-4.7 succeeds fine.

Is this a bug I should report? (Or should I make an "official" suggestion to use gcc everywhere where Apple-specific options aren't required as long as clang isn't completely ready to be the main compiler on linux? ;) )


Although this thread has turned into more of a clang++ discussion, I'll
just mention to that I am currently upgrading x264 to a more recent
version as part of upgrading ffmpeg to version 2.1.4 and will look into
this issue as part of that up upgrade.

While looking at some other stuff, I noticed that libvpx to 1.3.0 (we currently have 1.2.0) apparently including the VP9 codec.

http://blog.webmproject.org/2013/07/vp9-lands-in-chrome-dev-channel.html

Would you consider looking at upgrading libvpx, as well?

Craig
_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Reply via email to