On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 7:05 AM, "René J.V. Bertin" <[email protected]> wrote:
> That's got nothing to do with Apple-specific policies, right? Any idea how > Unix repositories get around that conflict? I expect git has an exception in its license terms for openssl. Otherwise, it's being distributed illegally; this doesn't seem to bother a lot of people (see for example how so many people ignore the terms of the NDA on OS X prereleases and ask questions on public forums), but given that Debian distributes git and they're usually pretty good at being a stickler for license terms, I would expect the exemption exists and we just have to confirm it and add it to the Portfile. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates [email protected] [email protected] unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
