On May 24, 2015, at 10:14 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > I suppose I should have said that *my* interest in this discussion is > about maintenance and not performance. But better performance would > definitely be a plus. > > And from a maintenance perspective, libjpeg-turbo looks like a clear > win. > > - libjpeg-turbo upstream seems to care about maintaining compatibility > while making meaningful improvements. > - libjpeg upstream seems to be willing to break compatibility > frequently, for the sake of making changes of questionable utility. > > The former could get us better performance and improved stability. To > ensure that stability with the latter, we'd have to freeze it at an old > version forever.
Ok yes I agree with all that. _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
