On Tuesday March 07 2017 16:32:37 j. van den hoff wrote: > right. and I would have thought _that_ part of your original mail (the > main part seemingly was concerned with POSIX compliance, no?) you had > already answered yourself via issuing `/bin/sh --version'?
Indeed, but on 10.9 . I needed to be certain that there had been no changes no matter how unlikely that seemed (or not, given Apple's allergy towards GPL'ed software). R.