Interesting, what is the output of the following?

$ which -a sed


Cheers!
Frank

> On Nov 6, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Adam Dershowitz <de...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> 
> Trying it verbose was a good suggestion.  For me, it still hangs, but I did 
> get some more info.  Here are the last few lines, where it finally just hangs:
> 
> /bin/sh ../libtool  --tag=CXX   --mode=link /usr/bin/clang++ -std=gnu++11 
> -Wall -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-mismatched-tags -I../libs/clipper 
> -I../libs/variant/include  -I/opt/local/include/freetype2 
> -I/opt/local/include/libpng16    -I../libs/xxHash      -pipe -Os 
> -stdlib=libc++ -arch x86_64    -L/opt/local/lib 
> -Wl,-headerpad_max_install_names -arch x86_64 -o dvisvgm dvisvgm.o 
> libdvisvgm.a ../libs/clipper/libclipper.a -L/opt/local/lib -lfreetype   
> ../libs/xxHash/libxxhash.a  ../libs/ff-woff/libfontforge.a -L/opt/local/lib 
> -lwoff2enc -lbrotlienc  -L/opt/local/lib -lbrotlienc   -L/opt/local/lib 
> -lcrypto -lz -lpotrace -lgs -lkpathsea 
> libtool: link: /usr/bin/clang++ -std=gnu++11 -Wall -Wnon-virtual-dtor 
> -Wno-mismatched-tags -I../libs/clipper -I../libs/variant/include 
> -I/opt/local/include/freetype2 -I/opt/local/include/libpng16 -I../libs/xxHash 
> -pipe -Os -stdlib=libc++ -arch x86_64 -Wl,-headerpad_max_install_names -arch 
> x86_64 -o dvisvgm dvisvgm.o  -L/opt/local/lib libdvisvgm.a 
> ../libs/clipper/libclipper.a -lfreetype ../libs/xxHash/libxxhash.a 
> ../libs/ff-woff/libfontforge.a -lwoff2enc -lbrotlienc -lcrypto -lz -lpotrace 
> -lgs -lkpathsea
> make[2]: Leaving directory 
> `/opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_ports_graphics_dvisvgm/dvisvgm/work/dvisvgm-2.6.1/src'
> Making all in tests
> make[2]: Entering directory 
> `/opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_ports_graphics_dvisvgm/dvisvgm/work/dvisvgm-2.6.1/tests'
> Making all in data
> make[3]: Entering directory 
> `/opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_ports_graphics_dvisvgm/dvisvgm/work/dvisvgm-2.6.1/tests/data'
> make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
> make[3]: Leaving directory 
> `/opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_ports_graphics_dvisvgm/dvisvgm/work/dvisvgm-2.6.1/tests/data'
> make[3]: Entering directory 
> `/opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_ports_graphics_dvisvgm/dvisvgm/work/dvisvgm-2.6.1/tests'
> make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
> make[3]: Leaving directory 
> `/opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_ports_graphics_dvisvgm/dvisvgm/work/dvisvgm-2.6.1/tests'
> make[2]: Leaving directory 
> `/opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_ports_graphics_dvisvgm/dvisvgm/work/dvisvgm-2.6.1/tests'
> Making all in doc
> make[2]: Entering directory 
> `/opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_ports_graphics_dvisvgm/dvisvgm/work/dvisvgm-2.6.1/doc'
> sed -e 's/@VERSION[@]/2.6.1/g' -e 
> 's/@PACKAGE_BUGREPORT[@]/martin.giesek...@uos.de 
> <mailto:martin.giesek...@uos.de>/g' dvisvgm.txt.in >dvisvgm.txt
> touch -r dvisvgm.txt.in dvisvgm.txt
> 
> 
> --Adam
> 
> 
> 
>> On Nov 6, 2018, at 9:52 AM, Marius Schamschula <li...@schamschula.com 
>> <mailto:li...@schamschula.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> I also ran into this on my High Sierra machine this morning. I halted the 
>> job, restarted it in verbose mode, and it finished.
>> 
>>> On Nov 6, 2018, at 8:49 AM, Adam Dershowitz <de...@alum.mit.edu 
>>> <mailto:de...@alum.mit.edu>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I’ve done that.  It just shows make at 98.8% cpu.  When I’ve tried to 
>>> sample, I get a call chain that has a lot of ??? (in make).  I tried to add 
>>> a screen shot of the call chain, since activity monitor won’t allow me to 
>>> copy, but the message ended up being too large.
>>> The beginning of the call chain is:
>>> 100.000% Thread_2395191 DispatchQueue_1: com.apple.main-thread (serial)
>>>     100.000% start (in libdyld.dylib) + 1 [0x7fff58345015]
>>>             100.000% ??? (in make) load address…(I’m not typing these out)
>>>                     93.103% ??? (in make) load address…
>>>                             etc
>>> 
>>> So, it is hanging up in “make”.  
>>> Very strange.  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --Adam
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Nov 6, 2018, at 9:36 AM, Ken Cunningham 
>>>> <ken.cunningham.web...@gmail.com <mailto:ken.cunningham.web...@gmail.com>> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> As it seems so far you're the only one with the hiccup, you have to see 
>>>> what's happening. When it's stuck, run top to see what's eating up the 
>>>> clock. Activity Monitor or ps to see what's running. Possibly sample the 
>>>> process that's stuck .to see what it's doing.
>>>> 
>>>> Ken
>>>> 
>>>>> On Nov 6, 2018, at 06:31, Adam Dershowitz <de...@alum.mit.edu 
>>>>> <mailto:de...@alum.mit.edu>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Nov 6, 2018, at 1:17 AM, Mojca Miklavec <mo...@macports.org 
>>>>>> <mailto:mo...@macports.org>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Dear Adam,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 at 05:24, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I’m upgrading dvisvgm from to 2.3.4_4 to 2.6.1_0.  I’m on a fairly 
>>>>>>> recent MacBook pro, and it has been building for 13 hours!  The process 
>>>>>>> is “make” and it’s taking 100% of just one CPU.  Does this sound 
>>>>>>> correct?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> No. Anything longer than a couple of minutes sounds wrong. The build
>>>>>> is not super fast as for some lightweight ports, but it's not
>>>>>> particularly heavy either.
>>>>> 
>>>>> That’s what I thought.  
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Should I just kill it and clean the port, then retry?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I tried again, and got the same result after cleaning.  Any other 
>>>>> suggestions?  I’ll file a ticket, although this port doesn’t have a 
>>>>> Maintainer, and there won’t be final log to attach, since it just hangs.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Also, is there a way to determine which ports are available as binaries 
>>>>>>> from the buildbots?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I agree that it would be cool to have a command to check that
>>>>>> automatically, but at the moment you can check it manually on
>>>>>> packages.macports.org <http://packages.macports.org/>, for example:
>>>>>> http://packages.macports.org/gcc7/ <http://packages.macports.org/gcc7/>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> However the folder for dvisvgm doesn't exist due to:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> $ port_binary_distributable.tcl -v dvisvgm
>>>>>> "dvisvgm" is not distributable because its license "GPL-3+"
>>>>>> conflicts with license "GPL-2" of dependency "libpaper"
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> (I wasn't aware that not ever GPL-2 is compatible with GPL-3+? Doesn't
>>>>>> that sound particularly strange?)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sometimes the binary would not be available due to the builders not
>>>>>> being able to keep up with the queue fast enough, in particular when
>>>>>> someone submits a patch to all gcc compilers at once :), but this
>>>>>> clearly wasn't the case here.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Mojca
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to