/usr/bin/sed

--Adam



> On Nov 6, 2018, at 11:49 AM, <m...@macports.org> <m...@macports.org> wrote:
> 
> Interesting, what is the output of the following?
> 
> $ which -a sed
> 
> 
> Cheers!
> Frank
> 
>> On Nov 6, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Adam Dershowitz <de...@alum.mit.edu 
>> <mailto:de...@alum.mit.edu>> wrote:
>> 
>> Trying it verbose was a good suggestion.  For me, it still hangs, but I did 
>> get some more info.  Here are the last few lines, where it finally just 
>> hangs:
>> 
>> /bin/sh ../libtool  --tag=CXX   --mode=link /usr/bin/clang++ -std=gnu++11 
>> -Wall -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-mismatched-tags -I../libs/clipper 
>> -I../libs/variant/include  -I/opt/local/include/freetype2 
>> -I/opt/local/include/libpng16    -I../libs/xxHash      -pipe -Os 
>> -stdlib=libc++ -arch x86_64    -L/opt/local/lib 
>> -Wl,-headerpad_max_install_names -arch x86_64 -o dvisvgm dvisvgm.o 
>> libdvisvgm.a ../libs/clipper/libclipper.a -L/opt/local/lib -lfreetype   
>> ../libs/xxHash/libxxhash.a  ../libs/ff-woff/libfontforge.a -L/opt/local/lib 
>> -lwoff2enc -lbrotlienc  -L/opt/local/lib -lbrotlienc   -L/opt/local/lib 
>> -lcrypto -lz -lpotrace -lgs -lkpathsea 
>> libtool: link: /usr/bin/clang++ -std=gnu++11 -Wall -Wnon-virtual-dtor 
>> -Wno-mismatched-tags -I../libs/clipper -I../libs/variant/include 
>> -I/opt/local/include/freetype2 -I/opt/local/include/libpng16 
>> -I../libs/xxHash -pipe -Os -stdlib=libc++ -arch x86_64 
>> -Wl,-headerpad_max_install_names -arch x86_64 -o dvisvgm dvisvgm.o  
>> -L/opt/local/lib libdvisvgm.a ../libs/clipper/libclipper.a -lfreetype 
>> ../libs/xxHash/libxxhash.a ../libs/ff-woff/libfontforge.a -lwoff2enc 
>> -lbrotlienc -lcrypto -lz -lpotrace -lgs -lkpathsea
>> make[2]: Leaving directory 
>> `/opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_ports_graphics_dvisvgm/dvisvgm/work/dvisvgm-2.6.1/src'
>> Making all in tests
>> make[2]: Entering directory 
>> `/opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_ports_graphics_dvisvgm/dvisvgm/work/dvisvgm-2.6.1/tests'
>> Making all in data
>> make[3]: Entering directory 
>> `/opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_ports_graphics_dvisvgm/dvisvgm/work/dvisvgm-2.6.1/tests/data'
>> make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
>> make[3]: Leaving directory 
>> `/opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_ports_graphics_dvisvgm/dvisvgm/work/dvisvgm-2.6.1/tests/data'
>> make[3]: Entering directory 
>> `/opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_ports_graphics_dvisvgm/dvisvgm/work/dvisvgm-2.6.1/tests'
>> make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
>> make[3]: Leaving directory 
>> `/opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_ports_graphics_dvisvgm/dvisvgm/work/dvisvgm-2.6.1/tests'
>> make[2]: Leaving directory 
>> `/opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_ports_graphics_dvisvgm/dvisvgm/work/dvisvgm-2.6.1/tests'
>> Making all in doc
>> make[2]: Entering directory 
>> `/opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_ports_graphics_dvisvgm/dvisvgm/work/dvisvgm-2.6.1/doc'
>> sed -e 's/@VERSION[@]/2.6.1/g' -e 
>> 's/@PACKAGE_BUGREPORT[@]/martin.giesek...@uos.de 
>> <mailto:martin.giesek...@uos.de>/g' dvisvgm.txt.in >dvisvgm.txt
>> touch -r dvisvgm.txt.in dvisvgm.txt
>> 
>> 
>> --Adam
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Nov 6, 2018, at 9:52 AM, Marius Schamschula <li...@schamschula.com 
>>> <mailto:li...@schamschula.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I also ran into this on my High Sierra machine this morning. I halted the 
>>> job, restarted it in verbose mode, and it finished.
>>> 
>>>> On Nov 6, 2018, at 8:49 AM, Adam Dershowitz <de...@alum.mit.edu 
>>>> <mailto:de...@alum.mit.edu>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I’ve done that.  It just shows make at 98.8% cpu.  When I’ve tried to 
>>>> sample, I get a call chain that has a lot of ??? (in make).  I tried to 
>>>> add a screen shot of the call chain, since activity monitor won’t allow me 
>>>> to copy, but the message ended up being too large.
>>>> The beginning of the call chain is:
>>>> 100.000% Thread_2395191 DispatchQueue_1: com.apple.main-thread (serial)
>>>>    100.000% start (in libdyld.dylib) + 1 [0x7fff58345015]
>>>>            100.000% ??? (in make) load address…(I’m not typing these out)
>>>>                    93.103% ??? (in make) load address…
>>>>                            etc
>>>> 
>>>> So, it is hanging up in “make”.  
>>>> Very strange.  
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --Adam
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Nov 6, 2018, at 9:36 AM, Ken Cunningham 
>>>>> <ken.cunningham.web...@gmail.com 
>>>>> <mailto:ken.cunningham.web...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> As it seems so far you're the only one with the hiccup, you have to see 
>>>>> what's happening. When it's stuck, run top to see what's eating up the 
>>>>> clock. Activity Monitor or ps to see what's running. Possibly sample the 
>>>>> process that's stuck .to see what it's doing.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ken
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Nov 6, 2018, at 06:31, Adam Dershowitz <de...@alum.mit.edu 
>>>>>> <mailto:de...@alum.mit.edu>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Nov 6, 2018, at 1:17 AM, Mojca Miklavec <mo...@macports.org 
>>>>>>> <mailto:mo...@macports.org>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Dear Adam,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 at 05:24, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I’m upgrading dvisvgm from to 2.3.4_4 to 2.6.1_0.  I’m on a fairly 
>>>>>>>> recent MacBook pro, and it has been building for 13 hours!  The 
>>>>>>>> process is “make” and it’s taking 100% of just one CPU.  Does this 
>>>>>>>> sound correct?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> No. Anything longer than a couple of minutes sounds wrong. The build
>>>>>>> is not super fast as for some lightweight ports, but it's not
>>>>>>> particularly heavy either.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> That’s what I thought.  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Should I just kill it and clean the port, then retry?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I tried again, and got the same result after cleaning.  Any other 
>>>>>> suggestions?  I’ll file a ticket, although this port doesn’t have a 
>>>>>> Maintainer, and there won’t be final log to attach, since it just hangs.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Also, is there a way to determine which ports are available as 
>>>>>>>> binaries from the buildbots?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I agree that it would be cool to have a command to check that
>>>>>>> automatically, but at the moment you can check it manually on
>>>>>>> packages.macports.org <http://packages.macports.org/>, for example:
>>>>>>> http://packages.macports.org/gcc7/ <http://packages.macports.org/gcc7/>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> However the folder for dvisvgm doesn't exist due to:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> $ port_binary_distributable.tcl -v dvisvgm
>>>>>>> "dvisvgm" is not distributable because its license "GPL-3+"
>>>>>>> conflicts with license "GPL-2" of dependency "libpaper"
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> (I wasn't aware that not ever GPL-2 is compatible with GPL-3+? Doesn't
>>>>>>> that sound particularly strange?)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Sometimes the binary would not be available due to the builders not
>>>>>>> being able to keep up with the queue fast enough, in particular when
>>>>>>> someone submits a patch to all gcc compilers at once :), but this
>>>>>>> clearly wasn't the case here.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Mojca
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to