On Dec 6, 2020, at 16:44, Richard L. Hamilton wrote: > Why should that change? You don't pre-build binaries for more than a few very > common variants, so you wouldn't do so for static variants using such a > capability. True, we only build the port's default variants (and universal, if some port depends on it being universal), so if the proposal is to hide this functionality in a "static" variant, and if we don't change the buildbot to build more than just the default variants, then there would not be a problem of how to rebuild the binaries on the buildbot.
- Re: Compiling a port statically Ken Cunningham
- Re: Compiling a port statically Ryan Schmidt
- Re: Compiling a port statical... Ken Cunningham
- Re: Compiling a port statically Riccardo Mottola via macports-users
- Re: Compiling a port statically Richard L. Hamilton
- Re: Compiling a port statical... Ryan Schmidt
- Re: Compiling a port statically Ryan Schmidt
- Re: Compiling a port statical... Richard L. Hamilton
- Re: Compiling a port stat... Ryan Schmidt
- Re: Compiling a port ... Richard L. Hamilton
- Re: Compiling a ... Ryan Schmidt
- Re: Compiling a ... Richard L. Hamilton
- Re: Compiling a ... Ryan Schmidt
- Re: Compiling a ... Richard L. Hamilton
- Re: Compiling a port statical... Riccardo Mottola via macports-users
- Re: Compiling a port statically Dave Horsfall
- Re: Compiling a port statical... Ryan Schmidt
- Re: Compiling a port statical... Richard L. Hamilton
- Re: Compiling a port stat... Clemens Lang
- Re: Compiling a port ... Richard L. Hamilton
- Re: Compiling a port statical... Dave Horsfall