I dono, it was just a thought... I'll let others comment. Maybe I just tend to over anolyze things, but what else is new. LOL!
Chris. Do you use Twitter? If so, then, I'd love! for you to follow me. My twitter URL is: http://twitter.com/chris28210 ----- Original Message ----- From: Martin Pilkington To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 9:46 PM Subject: Re: Understanding Blind User's Needs Hmm, I guess I'm just a little confused about what benefit this would have over voice over. Voice over is on every mac so it's not like you'd ever been in a situation where you don't have voice access. Unless there's something I'm not understanding it seems like it would be an awful lot of work to give you what voice over already does. --------------------------------- Martin Pilkington Writer of Weird Symbols pi...@mcubedsw.com On 9 Mar 2009, at 1:26 am, Chris Gilland wrote: By self voicing I mean, have it so that with voice over not running the program would still speak right out of the box. In other words, give the user the option of using voice over, or! being able to rely on speech just within the program itself. Kind a like what happens with the clock being self voicing upon the hr half hr or quarter, if you set that up in universal access. Hince: you don't need vo running for that to work. Chris. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
