Nice post, Max.
Donna

> -----Original Message-----
> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Maxwell Ivey Jr.
> Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 9:29 PM
> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: 3 features that hmm?
> 
> 
> Hello;  Just speaking for myself the hardest adjustment i had to make
> when moving to a mac was getting used to the way you have to edit
> text.  Now, that I understand it, it is second nature; but it was a
> real headache in the beginning.  Another one that was a tough one to
> get my mind around was not having multiple windows in my browser.  I
> finallly found out that you can have multiple finder and safari
> windows you just cycle through them differently.  It sounds like apple
> was doing its best to listen and adapt to what people were saying were
> short comings in voiceover.  To me this is a good thing.  Maybe they
> didn't get this one issue right, but I believe they continually make
> an honest effort to give us the most accessible easiest to use product
> out there.  I'm still planning to wait on snow lepard.  You know why?
> Its because of all the times I upgraded in windows and found things
> were worse instead of better.  Its for all the times I kept using the
> previous version of software out of fear that the next one wouldn't
> work with jaws.  So, thanks to apple for voiceover and their
> continuing commitment to universal access.  You all take care, Max
> On Aug 29, 2009, at 7:45 PM, Marie Howarth wrote:
> 
> >
> > think I did say I was glad of the choice, just sad apple had to
> > accomodate those who find it impossible to edit text in the way it is
> > meant to be edited. they are features that yes, fine they are here
> > now, just weren't really missing in my opinion. If others need their
> > screen reader to hold their hand cool. whatever everyone needs. as I
> > stated, opinion, that's all. everyone's allowed those :)
> >
> > On Aug 30, 2009, at 1:39 AM, Scott Howell wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Come on this is crazy. You just can't imagine the number of people
> >> who
> >> bitched and complained about this whole editing issue and I believe
> >> Apple was taken to task by one of the rags put out by the NFB or
> some
> >> organization about the editing issue.  APparently enough people
> >> complained that Apple was trying to provide the flexibility for
> those
> >> users who need it.  Yeah, I am one of the Scotts who made this point
> >> because I remember clearly the noise about this editing issue.  I
> see
> >> no benefit in removing it and quite frankly since it's here,
> whatever
> >> at this point.  If it really helps someone , fine because there are
> >> those who would simply not consider the Mac for this reason.  It is
> >> an
> >> option and not a default and that is why it's a feature not worth
> >> removing. My point is you have to think beyond what you have stated
> >> and I don't entirely disagree with your point of what is or is not a
> >> standard way of editing etc.  At the same time, it obviously didn't
> >> take a great deal of effort to implement it and at least it is an
> >> option.
> >> On Aug 29, 2009, at 7:14 PM, Scott Chesworth wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Also just my oppinion, but I disagree about points 1 and 2.
> >>>
> >>> Can't say I ever have used feature numero uno in any OS as there
> are
> >>> so few webpages I'd actually want to read 100% of their content,
> but
> >>> someone somewhere will find it useful.  You could argue that the
> >>> reading webpages automatically is as close as Apple could get to a
> >>> sighted person glancing at the screen when the page comes up and
> >>> taking in the bigger picture, which we can't do.
> >>>
> >>> Voiceover hints are definitely useful and a good thing.  Context
> >>> sensitive help like that enables most people to be on a way shorter
> >>> learning curve usually than reading a whole manual and trying to
> >>> apply
> >>> things to a ton of situations at once.  It's annoying that they're
> >>> enabled by default for you or I perhaps, but newbies are going to
> >>> thank Apple for it no doubt.  Come to that, so will developers who
> >>> fire up VO for the first time when they receive a disgruntled email
> >>> from someone who's asking them to make adjustments to their
> >>> applications.  It'll instantly demonstrate to them the difference
> >>> between what works and what doesn't, it gives them instructions
> >>> equally as precise as that email from the VI user would in most
> >>> cases.
> >>>
> >>> Wholeheartedly agreed about point 3 though.  I just don't get this
> >>> one.  You also hit the nail right on the head with the reason the
> >>> option shouldn't exist, it modifies a standard that doesn't in any
> >>> way
> >>> need to be modified, purely because of some VI people's rut that
> >>> they're firmly jammed into.  To add weight to a big sweeping
> >>> oppinion
> >>> like that, I should say that I was raised on Windows, still use
> >>> Windows more often than many on here I expect, and I make my fair
> >>> share of mistakes editing in Mac OS if I haven't done any in a
> >>> while.
> >>> I don't see this option as the solution, I see it as cheating.  I
> >>> doubt that many people will see this as an option to ease their
> >>> progression into Mac OS as one of the other Scott's suggested,
> >>> human's
> >>> just don't work that way, for the most part we're creatures of
> habit
> >>> even if they're bad ones.
> >>>
> >>> Tricky one though isn't it.  Emailing Apple and asking that a
> >>> feature
> >>> be removed seems somehow wrong in my mind.  In any case, I'm not
> >>> sure
> >>> they'd get it.  I just tried to explain why I disagree with the
> >>> feature and what's potentially at stake here to a sighted mac user,
> >>> and she point blank didn't get it.  I'm not sure that anyone who
> >>> hasn't had to appreciate how cool mainstream technology that works
> >>> for
> >>> us out of the box would, even Apple themselves might not, they
> >>> probably see the introduction of this feature as the best thing
> they
> >>> could've done to silence a lot of whinging lol.
> >>>
> >>> Just my 2 cents, or perhaps pennies worth for those on this side of
> >>> the pond...
> >>> Scott
> >>>
> >>> On 8/29/09, Scott Howell <s.how...@verizon.net> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Well good for you, I'm glad you did not need these features and
> you
> >>>> learned the way we all started out.  However, of course the only
> >>>> plus
> >>>> side is that for those who want to make the transition and really
> >>>> find
> >>>> what we "grew up with" difficult, will at least have a way to ease
> >>>> their transition over from the dark side. :)  So, I agree with
> you,
> >>>> but these are small prices to pay if it will truly help someone
> >>>> make
> >>>> the transition.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Aug 29, 2009, at 6:17 PM, Marie Howarth wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> well, this is purely my opinion but 3 features that horribly
> >>>>> remind me
> >>>>> of windows are as follows.
> >>>>> 1. automatic reading of a webpage.
> >>>>> 2. voice over hints. I know what to do in a text area, especially
> >>>>> when
> >>>>> it already says edit text.
> >>>>> 3. insertion point. this has been discussed, it's counter
> >>>>> intuitive
> >>>>> and doesn't teach the vi community how it would look to sighties.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> all I can say is I'm so glad these features are optional. they
> are
> >>>>> just horrific and no one can tell me that it will help
> progression
> >>>>> from windows to mac. I didn't have these features and I am so
> >>>>> glad I
> >>>>> did. mac is not windows, when will people realise this.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> overall vo rocks even more in this version, and I am grateful to
> >>>>> apple
> >>>>> for giving us a choice. really glad.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >
> >
> > >
> 
> 
> > 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.71/2333 - Release Date:
> 08/29/09 17:51:00


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to