That's true, I can definitely see your point there, and something I admit I 
didn't really think of.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 1, 2014, at 10:53 PM, Eugenia Firth <gigifi...@me.com> wrote:
> 
> Yes, but there are some folks who could get by with an IOS device only. If 
> you do wanted BARD, email, and the ability to write text files, you could 
> very easily just use your iPhone, maybe with a keyboard. I know a blind gal 
> right now that, if she got a computer, would be better off with an iPhone 
> instead of what she might be about to do because somebody is talking her into 
> it. 
> 
> There is an organization here in Texas that gives away Windows computers to 
> blind people. Sounds real good right? The only thing is that they are giving 
> these computers to blind people that are unable to get them through the state 
> and in most cases, as far as I can tell, usually people with very low income. 
> However, there's no training, and they are giving them to people, for the 
> most part, who know nothing about computers. They come right out and say that 
> you have to have someone on hand to help you learn your system because they 
> don't do it. The other thing they do is to put the demo version of WindowEyes 
> in the computer, and then the receivers of these computers that they will 
> need to get WindowEyes when the time runs out. 
> 
> My friend is considering this, and I told her to make sure that the person 
> that was helping her get this computer was going to hebbp her later, and I 
> warned her about getting WindowEyes later. She could NVDA in there, but then 
> she would have to to learn a new screen reader, and this lady knows just 
> about nothing concerning computers. I'm glad she told me she was thinking 
> about it. 
> 
> If she were to get an IOS device, she wouldn't have this problem. In fact, 
> she wouldn't have this problem if this same organization would figure out a 
> way to give some of these people Macs. At least they wouldn't have to get 
> screen reader software later. I recently heard a talk given by a 
> representative of this organization, and I asked him if they would be 
> receptive to other computers. He said yes, but then he sort blew off my 
> concerns when I started to mention the issues above. 
> 
> Regards, 
> Gigi 
> 
>> On Apr 1, 2014, at 8:08 PM, Josh Gregory <joshkar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi, If I may, and no disrespect, but a computer is still needed for some 
>> things that a tablet or smart phone cannot currently do. Having said that, I 
>> will give you that these devices can do a heck of a lot more than they could 
>> several years ago.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Apr 1, 2014, at 9:12 PM, erik burggraaf <e...@erik-burggraaf.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I find my mac more stable than pc's although I so seldome use a pc these 
>>> days and the ones I do use are tweaked down so they perform really well.
>>> 
>>> I've been using a mack for 6 years now and have no reason to prefer a PC 
>>> these days.  Having said that, this will be my last ever mac.  When it is 
>>> ready to move on in another couple of years, the personal computer itself 
>>> will be on the longtail and it just won't make any sense to invest in 
>>> another personal computer, mac or PC.  In fact, an increasing number of my 
>>> clients are just as effective on a tablet or smart phone as they are on a 
>>> computer, and it meets all of their day to day computing needs very well, 
>>> including: email, web browsing, web applications such as apps and mobile 
>>> banking, OCR reading, bar code identification diabetes and other medical 
>>> monitoring, non-verbal communication, literature access in braille, large 
>>> print and audio, and more.  The world of office tasks has now opened up to 
>>> us using IOS 7 and android 4.4.  Several printing solutions are accessible 
>>> including the samsung one that I am currently using.  Simple audio 
>>> production tasks are viable.  And we have access to features that aren't 
>>> really viable on pc's such as security systems management, and GPS 
>>> navigation.  Soon we'll have micro-location support and many other 
>>> opportunities that will encourage us to leave the desktop/laptop world 
>>> behind.  It may behoove you to simply invest more time learning IOS and 
>>> picking up apps and accessories that enrich your experience in the mobile 
>>> world, rather than investing in a switch to an expensive new technology 
>>> that will be obsolete in three years.  We are just now stepping inside the 
>>> time frame where cost vs efficiency of PC systems is about to become a 
>>> serious concern in the consumer market.
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> 
>>> Erik Burggraaf
>>> Ebony Consulting toll-free: 1-888-255-5194
>>> or on the web at http://www.erik-burggraaf.com
>>> 
>>>> On 2014-04-01, at 5:24 PM, Mike Arrigo <n0...@charter.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I find the mac to be very stable, certainly far less problems than with 
>>>> windows. It's not perfect, no platform is, but I have 3 macs and have no 
>>>> desire to switch back to a PC.
>>>> Original message:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>> 
>>>>> As I said previously, I am thinking about getting a Mac and the main 
>>>>> reason is that I am tired of the increasing instability of the PC 
>>>>> environment. My first question is, is this really different on a Mac?
>>>> 
>>>>> I am using JAWS 15 with Windows 8. Both are not all that stable. I have 
>>>>> been a JAWS user for 17 years and I have noticed a definite progressive 
>>>>> increase in instability with the last few releases. JAWS crashes 
>>>>> frequently and, even if it doesn’t crash, it often stops talking when 
>>>>> errors occur with other applications. Then, there’s Windows 8. I don’t 
>>>>> mind the Windows 8 interface but several times per week, I will have a 
>>>>> problem that requires me to restart my computer. I did not have that 
>>>>> nearly as much with Windows 7. Also, it isn’t unusual for me to install a 
>>>>> program which will, either directly or through add ins, make Windows 
>>>>> and/or JAWS more unstable. I then have to decide rather the additional 
>>>>> functionality is worth the increased instability. I’m just tired of all 
>>>>> the crashes and reboots and having to use three or four screen readers 
>>>>> because I have to run one when another one crashes.
>>>> 
>>>>> By contrast, my iPhone and iPad, while not perfect, are certainly more 
>>>>> stable. VoiceOver seldom just stops working. Of course, every single app 
>>>>> is not accessible and they do not all work correctly but any problems 
>>>>> with an app are almost always confined only to that app. When an app 
>>>>> crashes, it usually does not also cause VoiceOver or the device to crash. 
>>>>> Is this also true of the Mac?
>>>> 
>>>>> I have certainly used technology enough to know that none of it is 
>>>>> perfect. However, I would like something that is better than the PC, when 
>>>>> it comes to stability. Over all, in your experience, is the Mac more 
>>>>> stable?
>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>> 
>>>>> Scott Duck --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>>>> email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>>>>> <mailto:macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com 
>>>>> <mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>.
>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries 
>>>>> <http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries>.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>>> email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to