Hi. Okay, perhaps I should clarify my statement. By "us", I meant those who need to work with current OS X only DAW platforms, like what you'd find in commercial studios, or, what an academic institution would expect you to use for teaching purposes etc. where the legacy operating system is not an option anymore.
Yes, if what you use works for you; meets your needs etc, then to you personally, it's not out dated. Cameron. -----Original Message----- From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Karen Lewellen Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 12:30 PM To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: an Imac and voiceover? this is a fun topic. I invite you to think about computers slightly differently, say like a mode of transportation. There are some who do not feel their needs are met unless they are zipping along on the super highway with the most recent off the showroom floor. There are others, who will pay thousands of dollars to drive say a vintage roles Royce. That vintage machine cost more because of its value to that individual, but its worth it to them, because it gets the job done as they define it. I tend to base all of my computer use, I dare say my technology use in general, on getting the job done consistently with few issues. Indeed I chose to maintain older mac structures since it was what I required to get the job done at a desired level, meaning I could provide my various audiences with quality storytelling. Therefore to me, there is nothing outdated about this technology, no more than say the above mentioned Roles. However, this is me, and what I define as tool need not be the same for you. I raised eyebrows at Cameron's" open doors for us," idea because this suggest that everyone here uses technology just the same, that they experience things as a one size fits all fashion, and for the same reasons. Our very discussion illustrates this is not true, and frankly I respect you too much as an individual, respect everyone too much to deny them their unique needs and tastes by thinking you have to do things the way I do them, smiles. To you, my setup is outdated technology. For me it is the right tool, and will continue to be the right tool, until it can no longer allow me to do my craft. as for how apple has met the needs of professionals like me, I invite you to review the history of apple's screen reading efforts and say the windows screen reading history to compare. I think that speaks for itself. Thanks for the exchange, Karen On Tue, 18 May 2010, Ben Mustill-Rose wrote: > You said: > now now, technology is only doorstop material when it no longer serves > its function. > I agree with this and own several older macs myself. However, people > (Not you poticually, just people in general) should be realistic about > what there hardware can and can not do. > pt has been accessible for years, so I do not understand this door concept. > Yes, it is accessible if you choos to stick with an older version, > running on old hardware with outdated assistive technology. > I have made a lot of radio and money with my use of pro tools with > outspoken, so have others. If this were not true apple would not > invest in reaching these professionals. > Perhaps I'm missing something, but what has apple done at all to reach > professionals like yourself? Surely if they have done anything, you > wouldn't have to be using the hardware and software that you do? > > On 18/05/2010, Dan Eickmeier <va3...@yahoo.ca> wrote: >> , I've got an intel iMac which I got in 2007, and it's working just fine. >> But if your iMac you have is a power PC one, such as a g3, or g4, you're not >> going to be able to. THe latest OS that you'll be able to, would be Tiger. >> On May 17, 2010, at 6:33 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote: >> >>> anyone running a voiceover solid os x edition on an imac? >>> will send the data specifics if that Will help. >>> thanks, >>> Karen >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "MacVisionaries" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "MacVisionaries" group. >> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. >> >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. > To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
