Hello Dickson, This is perfectly geeky in all the best ways. :) Thanks so much for sharing, and in spite of what I said earlier regarding size, etc, I'm in your camp on this one as well.
Have a fabulous afternoon Twitter: @IndigoCellist Skype: shameless_FanGirl Sent from my iPhone On Apr 15, 2011, at 11:16 AM, "Dickson Tan" <dickson.j...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've found this ridiculously long, 21-page review (which is very good, with > all the techy details you could want). This review talks about all the new > macs, the 13 and 15 inch models. I highly recommend reading through the > whole thing. > > http://www.anandtech.com/print/4205 > > If I were getting a new sandybridge macbook, I would get the 15" high-end > configuration option. > > -----Original Message----- > From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com > [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of ShamelessFanGirl > Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 10:18 PM > To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: macbook pro specks? > > Morning all, > > I find myself in that exact position with regard to which system to go for. > I love the form-factor, size, and weight of the 13 inch pro, intend to max > it as far as I can, certainly with regard to processor and ram, but to those > of you who use this system/configuration, how do you find it to play ? One > of the biggest complaints I've encountered from those folks who own them, is > the heft of carrying around a 15 inch pro. ideally, and in a perfect world, > I eventually want to get a Macbook pro for travel, an iMac for home usage to > alleviate a lot of my demand, wear and tear on the pro in other words, and > throw my wickedly huge media library at something like a mini, but as I > said, that's in a perfect world, so I'm brought back to the unending loop of > where to begin this venture first? Decisions, decisions...If the trend in > cases, etc is anything to go by, the 13 inch footprint seems to be where a > lot of folks fetch up, yet for me, it comes down to power, as I'm the sort > of person who pushes my system hard, simply to watch it surpass expectation. > > > Thanks for any/all input, and for that given so far. > > > Twitter: @IndigoCellist > > Skype: shameless_FanGirl > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Apr 15, 2011, at 8:42 AM, "Dickson Tan" <dickson.j...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Can you tell me, in as much detail as possible, what you can remember >> of the specs of the 2 macbook pros you are thinking of buying? >> >> If performance is important to you, then getting a 2nd generation core >> I7 quad core processor (also known as a sandybridge processor is the way > to go. >> When looking at the internal hard drive, the 7200RPM hard drives >> perform better than their 5400RPM counterparts or if you really want >> even better performance, then get a solid state drive (though it is >> very expensive), the performance of an SSD is unparralelled. You'd >> also want to get 4gb of ddr3 ram, running at 1366mhz or more, if you're > running a 64-bit system. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com >> [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Kliph&Sharrie >> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 5:20 AM >> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com >> Subject: RE: macbook pro specks? >> >> More detail is better for me, that way I know what I am getting with >> my choice. So please elaborate. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com >> [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Dickson Tan >> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 2:24 PM >> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com >> Subject: RE: macbook pro specks? >> >> No; you cannot compare processors from different generations that way. >> Which quad core I7 processor are you referring to? There is the first >> generation quad core I7 processor and the new second generation >> sandybridge quad core >> I7 processor, released only 2 months ago. >> >> Although the duel core processor you mentioned has higher clock speed, >> that doesn't mean that it is faster; clock speed isn't the only thing >> that determines a CPU's overall performance. Things like the number of >> cores (the higher the better), the size of L3 cache, whether the CPU >> supports turboboost 2.0 technology or not, how many threads the CPU >> can support at once are also contributing factors of the CPU's speed. >> >> Essentially, the quad core I7 processor is a lot faster than the duel >> core one. There are other things like a more powerful integrated GPU >> Chip which makes them so much faster, but I won't go into detail here. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com >> [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Kliph&Sharrie >> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 1:01 AM >> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com >> Subject: macbook pro specks? >> >> So, shopping around a little bit for what I might want. And I see >> that the >> 15.4 model macbook pros have a i7 quod core processor, and the 13.3 >> has a dool core. Now on the quod core the processor is listed at 2.2 >> GHZ, and on the dool core it's listed at 2.7 GHZ, both with 4 gigs of >> ram. Does that make them about the same speed? >> >> >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "MacVisionaries" group. >> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "MacVisionaries" group. >> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "MacVisionaries" group. >> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MacVisionaries" group. >> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MacVisionaries" group. > To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MacVisionaries" group. > To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.