Hi again,
I ask this because of the technically smart folks here, and as at least I
can tell, it might be a solution that helps both parties.
remember, or still using for that matter, books recorded in 15/16 ips?
nls, rfb&d all produced that way, and those allowing for production had
little fear where copyright was concerned.
Why cannot such a format be created, wider than Dasi I mean, to insure the
same access and copyright protection?
say an. act format, for accessible text.
Either any application like the kindle or nook slated for educational use
would be required to read them in all formats, or they could not sell /
distribute their apps for other products, and or ebook producers would be
required to create an act format of their book just as they might for the
kindle or nook, or if the books are phone / ap specific, to be used with
whatever apps /phones they are producing the books for now.
I am not saying that cannot sell the books, although some should be
provided for educational purposes, much as textbook publishers would get
books to learning ally.
What I am saying is that a single consistent accessible format should be
created that insures everyone can read, while protecting content creators.
I may be missing a detail, I do not read this way because the readers do
not exist.
still, what is wrong technically with the idea?
The legal mandate would be rather simple actually, by comparison.
Karen
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
