Yeah, and like we don't ha8e any annoyances with those current others for 
Windows (not mentioning any, but it's not necessay.) 

Eugenia Firth
gigifi...@sbcglobal.net



On Jun 25, 2012, at 7:52 AM, Matthew Campbell wrote:

> Hi.
> Adding to what Ray said, It doesn't seem really that necessary for there to 
> be a 3rd party screen reading option for the Mac. Something like that will 
> probably cost $10000 or something else ridiculous and there will probably be 
> an SMA every version or so for another $1000.
> It seems like there's a lot of improvements to VO coming down the pipeline in 
> Mountain Lion. Maybe they will fix some of the minor annoyances with 
> VoiceOver.
> 
> 
> On 2012-06-25, at 8:42 AM, Ray Foret Jr wrote:
> 
>> Couldn't be more wrong.  Why you want to make the Mac more like clunky 
>> crashy windows?  It's not up to the screen reader to make things more 
>> accessible with more and more scripts which you have to keep up with; 
>> rather, that's up to the app developers.  That's how it is in the Mac world. 
>>  FS make a Mac screen reader?  Are you seriously kidding me?  No way it 
>> ain't gonna happen.
>> 
>> GWMicro neither.  They already have enough on their plate worying about 
>> windows type stuff.
>> 
>> 
>> Sincerely,
>> The Constantly Barefooted Ray!!!
>> 
>> Now a very proud and happy Mac user!!!
>> 
>> Skype name:
>> barefootedray
>> 
>> On Jun 25, 2012, at 7:08 AM, William Windels wrote:
>> 
>>> Hello,
>>> After working for more than 3 years with the mac , it's my personal 
>>> opinionthat more basic programs are accessible on windows then on the mac 
>>> platform.
>>> 
>>> I find it more stable to work on the mac because of the integration of the 
>>> screenreader voiceover with the osx.
>>> The fact that the hardware is also adapted for us by the trackpad and the 
>>> function-keys with the spoken values.
>>> And of course the flexible way we can install , manage the system with 
>>> voiceover support everywhere.
>>> 
>>> However, we can't e.g. configure dropbox with voiceover while this is 
>>> possible on windows, office programs like microsoft office and also iWork's 
>>> aren't fully accessible with lay-out tasks, in my opinion there are several 
>>> usability issues with the browsers on the mac, some ellements of the os , 
>>> like 
>>> Tables, on websites and on numbers and pages, are very difficult to 
>>> navigate e.g. you can't search for edit-fields on websites while they are 
>>> in a table and in pages, you can't work with tables on a comfortable way.
>>> the icon's on the status bar, can't be reached on a normal way with 
>>> voiceover...
>>> 
>>> My conclusion: a paid screenreader for the mac that makes program's 
>>> accessible with scripts (like screen readers on windows do), should be very 
>>> welcome I think.
>>> With this kind of optional screenreader, blind users should be able to use 
>>> all the equivalents on the mac of their windows favorites.  Perhaps it 
>>> should push apple  to make their screenreader better on a faster speed.
>>> 
>>> Why such screenreader doesn't exist yet?
>>> I see 2 reasons for this:
>>> 1. Apple should not be happy with this and the screenreader of apple should 
>>> have more possibilities to integrate with the os then the external 
>>> screenreader.
>>> 2. Other communities don't see a reason to make a screenreader for the mac 
>>> while there is one built in.  
>>> If it should be the second reason, any people with accessibility 
>>> frustrations on the mac , should communicate this to other companies like 
>>> gw micro, freedom scientific, baum...
>>> 
>>> Any opinions about this meanings should be very welcome.
>>> kind regards,
>>> William Windels
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to