Tabula rasa.  :)

There are some questions that you should ask yourselves. Thing of MeeGo as the 
Maemo many of you wanted: completely free operating system running on many 
kinds of devices from Nokia and others.

The nature and purpose of the Council changes in such context:

- There is no single company owning a stack to interact with. Nokia is now 
*really* a community member. A big one, but not the single provider it was in 
the Maemo context. What is the role of an elected community council in a 
context of working groups and technical steering committee? Don't expect an 
answer from "MeeGo". If you want to have a place in MeeGo then you are MeeGo as 
well, and such answer must come from you in the first place.

- What is actually the scope of the Maemo community? Developers only? Plus free 
software enthusiasts? Or also pure end users? Try to imagine the MeeGo 
community the day we have several devices and a bunch of free and commercial 
applications out there. Who will the community council represent? Who do you 
will to represent? Who makes the MeeGo community you wish?

- Who can vote? Who can be elected? Do you want to move the karma system 
forward to MeeGo? It has been a while since we start it in maemo.org. Time for 
a revision? What is good, what is bad about it? Again, don't expect the MeeGo 
technical steering group to come up with an answer. The proposal comes from you 
in the first place.

--
Quim Gil

_______________________________________________
maemo-community mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community

Reply via email to