Devesh Kothari wrote:
ext August Joki wrote:
In the To-Do List of the Minstral Roadmap
http://maemo.org/platform/docs/roadmap.html
(bottom of the page)
This is obviously a mistake. It should be something like
Future to-do :) or something though it does look like a Mistral Maemo
2.0 To-Do :)
thanks for pointing that out, that need to be fixed
Devesh
Oh buggers :(
And here i was hoping that we would move using it in this update allready.
Well, if not, can you give us an estimate on when this is going to be ?
This year? Next year? Or maybe in the next decade ?
Santeri
-August
On 5/18/06, Devesh Kothari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ext Santeri Lindgren wrote:
Ross Burton wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 12:42 +0300, Jussi Kukkonen wrote:
Eero Tamminen wrote:
I wonder if there are any real problems with maemo and scratchbox
1.0.x?
I haven't seen any so far... If no-one comes up with horror stories
about using 1.0 for maemo development, maybe the recommendation
could be
upgraded -- it would make installation easier (damping the culture
shock
for new developers) and give everyone access to the new features*.
Oh the pain. The true and unbelievable pain. Trust me, keep with
0.9.8
for now, and wait for Maemo to switch to Scratchbox 1.0.
Ross
If you have checked the OS 2006 news, it says that with OS 2006 SDK
Scratchbox 1.0 will be the thing to use.
Where did you hear that :) . Maemo 2.0 is not moving to SB 1.0, AFAIK
Devesh
Greets, Santeri
_______________________________________________
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
_______________________________________________
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
_______________________________________________
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
