ok. my preferences: lists: keep them as they are. reply-to: mangle them tags: don't care if you mangle the reply-to headers. keep them if not.
best regards, kemal On 2/5/07, Ed Okerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 10:55:12AM -0600, Ed Okerson wrote: >> And reply to all causes the original poster to get two copies of the >> mail, >> one of which is not handled by list filters because it did not go >> through >> the list. It is a royal pain to reply to all and cut and past the list >> address from the cc to the to line and clean it up so as to not cause >> too >> much pain for others. 99% of the replys to list mail should go to the >> list, so that means either causing extra traffic for people who actually >> post to the list, or extra work when replying to the list. > > Only for people with inferior mailers ;-) > > Yay for Mutt and single-keystroke reply-to-list! > >> I agree, >> change default reply-to to the list address. > > I think I could deal with both, but if the mailing list software mangles > the reply-to header, sooner or later I *will* post a personal message to > the list by accident. You are right, I just did not have the list module installed in the reader, it works better now. I no longer care. :)
-- Kemal _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
