Jeremiah Foster wrote: > Good point. But haven't we avoided the issue of requiring "that > packages have bug trackers, and use them for QA"? How is one going to > enforce bug trackers on applications submitted to Maemo? And if > someone does not want to create a bug tracker, for whatever reason, > how can we convince them not to open their own repo if Maemo rejects > their package?
Maemo will never 'reject' a package; extras-devel and extras-testing are always open However a package may not be deemed to meet the QA criteria for "extras" (one of which is a bug tracker). Maybe we should have extras-wild ? (So that non-QA-ed packages aren't bundled with QA-able ones that are on their way to Extras) Users can add Extras and Extras-wild if they wish. FWIW, Nokia would *never* enable (or even mention!) Extras-wild on an out-of-the-box tablet. Extras, we hope, would be suitable. David -- "Don't worry, you'll be fine; I saw it work in a cartoon once..." _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
