On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 13:20 +0000, Andrew Flegg wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:55, Graham Cobb <g+...@cobb.uk.net> wrote: > > On Friday 30 October 2009 11:44:17 Juha Kallioinen wrote: > >> And a perfectly good one too! :) It's useful not to change the upstream > >> package version too much so that it's easier to see that a package could > >> use updating. > > > > I agree with all Juha's points (but I would, wouldn't I!). > > Simplest solution I can see, whilst still giving the user some > indication of version number (3.4.1 tells you something over 0.0.1): > the Application Manager only shows things of the form (\d+)(\.\d+)*? > > So, the example of 2.0.0+cvs20040908+mp4v2+bmp-0ubuntu6maemo1 would > just appear as 2.0.0 in the view.
/me would be confused. Why is it upgrading 2.0.0 to 2.0.0 *again* ? David (Who presumably wouldn't see the -local_bugfix1 and -local_bugfix2 suffixes) _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
