On Tuesday 09 March 2010 11:56:49 Matan Ziv-Av wrote: > On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Niels Breet wrote: > > You have to see that Extras should be for applications that are of a high > > quality. The Extras repository should not give any problems to people who > > are new to Maemo and have no clue how to work with linux for instance. > > Here's the problem, there seems to be two (almost opposite) goals for > this extras repository: one is to be a collection of all maemo software, > eliminating the use of external repositories, the other is having a > collection only of high quality software. Until you accept that > you can't have both, those discussions will go on repeating.
There is nothing preventing (well, apart from autobuilder issues) people putting things into Extras-devel. It *is* a valid place for software, it's not the gutter, and not every application there is expected to enter Extras. I often feel the issues brought up in relation with the term 'quality' stem from different interpretations of the term -> terminology. Regards, Attila _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
