> I tend to favour either using a filespec (a file which dbus-scripts deletes > after the script has run) or using base64 (because there are probably > convenient libraries in many scripting languages).
good ideas. I think I'd rather the filespec. > Of course, this doesn't allow for more complex arrays and other complex types > which dbus allows. reinventing the wheel could be hard and dangerous so I was thinking about something like yaml. On the plus side, it's easy to parse with libraries. On the minus side, you need to have the library on n900. > But, maybe, in those cases dbus-scripts is the wrong tool > and it would be better to create a custom daemon to do whatever is required. I really like the idea of dbus-scripts to handle all my dbus scripts. I don't like the idea of having many daemons waiting for dbus signal. But that could be my sysadmin past... _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
