On Thursday 22 July 2010 10:40:51 Ville M. Vainio wrote: > As it appears, rabbit hole goes deeper than initially expected, so > don't hold your breath on getting the issue fixed in reasonable > timeframe :-/.
Just as a side-note - can we work on making at least the Ovi QA criteria public so that we do not get minefield issues like this one ? I understand Maemo5 is fairly new and small in the Ovi story, but it would greatly help if we could see the criteria - in the worst case, adapt to it without wasting any more time than necessary, and in the best case, working with Ovi/Nokia to improve the process to the benefit of all involved parties (seeing Nokians jump in this discussions helping clarify the issue is always a plus). As it is now, the Ovi publishing guide has a meager one-liner about publishing Qt apps and that one point to a (Maemo/MeeGo-wise) not too descriptive page on Forum Nokia. I would even attach my community stamp to this if needed - even though this is largely related to commercial apps, the question of QA (and through it any potential Extras-Ovi cooperation, as dreamy as that may sound) and general app availabilty is something that touches on the community as a whole. Best regards, Attila _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
