On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Felipe Crochik <fel...@crochik.com> wrote:
> We had this discussion not long ago ( > http://maemo.org/community/maemo-developers/maemo_qa_process/?org_openpsa_qbpager_net_nemein_discussion_posts_page=1 > ) > > > > I think the “appdownloader” has most of features we need to help users > find, install, test and review applications. If we also add to the > appdownloader reminders like “you installed xxxx 10 days ago, how would you > rate it?” we would have a much more effective process. > Inevitably, the question will pop-up, why did I made KISStester and not extend appdownloader or FAP ? I think both projects are excellent and wish they grow and prosper. BUT. I am really curious if I would want *that* sort of generic feedback in the testing queue. While having a separate app for it reduces the potential number of users, IMO it increases the chances of higher quality/SNR feedback or votes, meaning that we will be getting votes/comments from people who DID install the feedback software, it's not something sprung onto them by a (undoubtedly good, but) generic application installer. My target are the people who are willing to participate, have at least a rough understanding what they are getting into. Ideally QA is not about maximizing number of voters, but SNR. If we gain just a few dozen regular feedback persons, KISStester already did it's job. Best regards, Attila
_______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
