Quote: Ahmad Samir wrote on Tue, 05 October 2010 17:41 > > A rolling distro isn't a defined term, as Michael explained, now you > add "light" to the equation and it becomes even more undefined.
You shouldn't look at the name but rather at the description that me and others have given here earlier. > I said all I got to say on this topic, now I can wait and see how > things turn out (my guess would be it'll stay the same, Cauldron a > rolling/dev distro, and stable releases on predefined intervals, just > my "personal" guess). I guess that depends mostly on what the packagers will feel like doing, ultimately in a community distro nobody can be force anyone to do anything, if too few people are doing security fix backports but most are doing version backports then we will have this 'light' rolling distro (or whatever you want to call it), if not then we will have the old mdv model.
