Michael Scherer a écrit :
Le mardi 05 octobre 2010 à 20:17 +0200, Ahmad Samir a écrit :
On 5 October 2010 19:53, Tux 99<tux99-...@uridium.org> wrote:
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Ahmad Samir wrote:
I looked at the description that Michael gave. And I think I know what
a rolling distro is having Cooker and all :). light/heavy makes no
sense here.
I give up, i'm not sure if it's a communication problem or if you are
simply pretending not to understand to wind us up.
Well, according to you I don't understand what you're saying, and also
Michael doesn't understand what you're saying, but maybe it's
coincidence?
Well, let's try to be constructive.
For all people interested into having a rolling release or a core based
distribution, I propose that they write a document explaining :
- the release process ( ie, what you put on iso )
- based on what criteria
- time based ?
- regular snapshot ?
- features based ?
- how to decide what packages are upgraded day to day
- what criteria for what kind of upgrade ( version upgrade, patch
upgrade )
- what procedure for upgrade ( test stage, direct upgrade ? )
- for how long
- how are updates built ( ie, against what tree )
- what packages are not upgraded , unless there is a release, if there
is one
- what criteria warrant the stability of this component
- how do we decide it will be upgraded
Once people are able to produce this document, we will all be able to be
on the same wavelength.
Good idea :)
