On 26 November 2010 12:21, Marc Paré <m...@marcpare.com> wrote: > Le 2010-11-26 03:14, Wolfgang Bornath a écrit : >> >> 2010/11/26 andre999<and...@laposte.net>: >>> >>> MIhail Papadopoulos a écrit : >>>> >>>> >>>> Why not going down the right path: A rolling release cycle would be >>>> simply >>>> great. After all, this isn't a commercial distribution, so it shouldn't >>>> be >>>> a total noob Ubuntu-style mishmash. >>>> >>> >>> Why ? >>> What do you mean by "rolling" ? >>> How would it improve things for the user ? >>> How would it improve things for the developers/packages/translators who >>> provide Mageia ? >>> What are the costs ? >>> What are the benefits ? >>> And how does that compare with the alternatives ? >> >> This has already been discussed in length in one of the lists, very >> early, IIRC ist was early October . There were even polls in >> communities about. >> > > Yes it was. I think it will re-surface again due to Ubuntu's recent > advertising of going to a "rolling distro" scheme. We may have to go through > another round of these comments. > > Do we have an archive list of the user mailist where we can refer people to > continue on that particular thread? Are the mailists archived? > > Marc > Marketing Team Member > >
You mean the "rumours" that Ubuntu will switch to a rolling distro model? http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Ubuntu-Rolling-release-rumours-wrong-1142040.html (thanks to misc posting the link on IRC yesterday). -- Ahmad Samir