Op zaterdag 04 december 2010 20:58:12 schreef Erin Wilkins: > On December 4, 2010 10:06:37 Anssi Hannula wrote: > > On 03.12.2010 11:45, Ahmad Samir wrote: > > > On 2 December 2010 18:43, Michael Scherer <m...@zarb.org> wrote: > > >> Le jeudi 02 décembre 2010 à 16:26 +0100, Wolfgang Bornath a écrit : > > >>> 2010/12/2 Anssi Hannula <anssi.hann...@iki.fi>: > > >>>> For the record, I'm not a big fan of "tainted" name (too negative), > > >>>> but I can't think of anything better either, so... :) > > >>> > > >>> I agree, as "restricted" may be misleading former Mandriva users, why > > >>> not "special" or "extra"? > > >>> > > >>> I know there is the name "extra" for some other branch but it may be > > >>> easier to find another name for that one. > > >> > > >> That would be misleading to the content of the directory. > > >> > > >> What about "limited" ? > > >> "restrained" ? > > >> ( restrain, to deprive of liberty , seems like the perfect match ) > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Michael Scherer > > > > > > limited and restrained don't sound right as they don't fully convey > > > the purpose/filtering-rule for packages in that repo.... > > > > Indeed. > > > > Wolfgang's "foggy" sounds nice, but I think I prefer "tainted" anyway. > > Since the packages in that repository are there because they're > (potentially) encumbered by patents, why not call it for what it is, > "encumbered"? > > -- > Erin
too difficult