Op vrijdag 04 maart 2011 05:50:23 schreef Anssi Hannula: > On 04.03.2011 00:51, Maarten Vanraes wrote: > > Op donderdag 03 maart 2011 22:58:16 schreef nicolas vigier: > >> On Thu, 03 Mar 2011, Maarten Vanraes wrote: > >>> Op donderdag 03 maart 2011 22:31:10 schreef Romain d'Alverny: > >>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 21:54, Frank Griffin <f...@roadrunner.com> wrote: > >>>>> Maarten Vanraes wrote: > >>>>>> C. how about we make <packagename>@packages.mageia.org, which could > >>>>>> use the maintainers database to forward the email to maintainers > >>>>>> (in case of more) (this could also be a packagegroup. eg: > >>>>>> fire...@packages.mageia.org could refer to maintainers of firefox, > >>>>>> xulrunner, etc...) (this option might just be too complex) > >>>>> > >>>>> That is an elegant and excellent idea. > >>>> > >>>> Elegant, but as in a changelog, that means the email does not > >>>> match/identify/link to the _person_ taking the step of actually > >>>> committing/releasing the change, but the team in charge of managing > >>>> the package. Is that wanted? > >>>> > >>>> Romain > >>> > >>> it depends, the nickname could still be kept; and we were talking about > >>> having multiple maintainers in the future? > >> > >> Except that changelog is not for listing maintainers, but the persons > >> who did some changes. > > > > but changelog is for committing, not submitting? isn't this a totally > > different thing? > > I don't understand what you mean. > > Changelog is a log of changes made to the package.
afaik changelog is compiled from svn commit messages? i don't really understand how the submit could have an effect on changelog?