On Fri, 04 Mar 2011, Maarten Vanraes wrote: > Op vrijdag 04 maart 2011 05:50:23 schreef Anssi Hannula: > > On 04.03.2011 00:51, Maarten Vanraes wrote: > > > Op donderdag 03 maart 2011 22:58:16 schreef nicolas vigier: > > >> On Thu, 03 Mar 2011, Maarten Vanraes wrote: > > >>> Op donderdag 03 maart 2011 22:31:10 schreef Romain d'Alverny: > > >>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 21:54, Frank Griffin <f...@roadrunner.com> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>> Maarten Vanraes wrote: > > >>>>>> C. how about we make <packagename>@packages.mageia.org, which could > > >>>>>> use the maintainers database to forward the email to maintainers > > >>>>>> (in case of more) (this could also be a packagegroup. eg: > > >>>>>> fire...@packages.mageia.org could refer to maintainers of firefox, > > >>>>>> xulrunner, etc...) (this option might just be too complex) > > >>>>> > > >>>>> That is an elegant and excellent idea. > > >>>> > > >>>> Elegant, but as in a changelog, that means the email does not > > >>>> match/identify/link to the _person_ taking the step of actually > > >>>> committing/releasing the change, but the team in charge of managing > > >>>> the package. Is that wanted? > > >>>> > > >>>> Romain > > >>> > > >>> it depends, the nickname could still be kept; and we were talking about > > >>> having multiple maintainers in the future? > > >> > > >> Except that changelog is not for listing maintainers, but the persons > > >> who did some changes. > > > > > > but changelog is for committing, not submitting? isn't this a totally > > > different thing? > > > > I don't understand what you mean. > > > > Changelog is a log of changes made to the package. > > afaik changelog is compiled from svn commit messages? i don't really > understand how the submit could have an effect on changelog?
Who said submit has an effect on changelog ? Why are you talking about submit ?